5 ms·

That's a photo by the National Parks Service, timestamped 11:51AM, according to the Washington Post. Frankly I trust high-resolution photographic evidence vette

That's a photo by the National Parks Service, timestamped 11:51AM, according to the Washington Post. Frankly I trust high-resolution photographic evidence vetted by the National Parks Service and the Washington Post reporting staff, over your memory of unnamed, unsourced live video. But yeah both sides, totally. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/03/06/here-are-the-photos-that-show-obamas-inauguration-crowd-was-bigger-than-trumps/?utm_term=.635e2379177b https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/03/06/...

TallGuyShort 9y ago
http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/ http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-in... Really - there are stronger arguments against Trump.
- thomnottom 9y ago
  And that photo is from the opposite direction, focuses on a different part of the crowd, and in no way contradicts the smaller crowd shown in the other picture.
  - TallGuyShort 9y ago
    You know you can rotate the image, right? There are clear landmarks along the mall, countable rows of people, and but a single section where it even comes close to matching up.
    - thomnottom 9y ago
      Of course I rotated it. And my point stands. The perspective is still different. The rows of people are countable, and looking at some of the further sections there is no way I would be able to count as many rows as at the other. There are 2 sections filled with people at the Obama one that are completely blocked off on the Trump one. That can't be argued with at all. There are people who are good at estimating crowd sizes and I'll let them do their job. But, once again, this picture in no way contradicts the others.
- AndrewKemendo 9y ago
  Yea that picture definitely reinforces the original Parks Service one. You can see all the empty space and people milling around, not that far in the background. The Obama inauguration was shoulder to shoulder standing room only.
  - thomnottom 9y ago
    It's funny, I never bothered much analyzing these photos but now that I have it's obvious how much the Gigapixel backs up the WaPo photos. And yet the parent seems to believe that pointing out optical perspective differences means we're calling those pictures "right-leaning".
    - bduerst 9y ago
      They're using an increasingly popular derailment technique called the common ground fallacy. The parent is asserting that the truth is merely a compromise between two different opinions, when in reality there's evidence enough to assert the truth, without making it a matter of 'right' or 'left' opinion. Their inability to provide their credible sources ("high def video") is because their opinion doesn't align with the reality of the situation.

TallGuyShort 9y ago

http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/ http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-in... Really - there are stronger arguments against Trump.

thomnottom 9y ago
And that photo is from the opposite direction, focuses on a different part of the crowd, and in no way contradicts the smaller crowd shown in the other picture.
- TallGuyShort 9y ago
  You know you can rotate the image, right? There are clear landmarks along the mall, countable rows of people, and but a single section where it even comes close to matching up.
  - thomnottom 9y ago
    Of course I rotated it. And my point stands. The perspective is still different. The rows of people are countable, and looking at some of the further sections there is no way I would be able to count as many rows as at the other. There are 2 sections filled with people at the Obama one that are completely blocked off on the Trump one. That can't be argued with at all. There are people who are good at estimating crowd sizes and I'll let them do their job. But, once again, this picture in no way contradicts the others.
AndrewKemendo 9y ago
Yea that picture definitely reinforces the original Parks Service one. You can see all the empty space and people milling around, not that far in the background. The Obama inauguration was shoulder to shoulder standing room only.
- thomnottom 9y ago
  It's funny, I never bothered much analyzing these photos but now that I have it's obvious how much the Gigapixel backs up the WaPo photos. And yet the parent seems to believe that pointing out optical perspective differences means we're calling those pictures "right-leaning".
  - bduerst 9y ago
    They're using an increasingly popular derailment technique called the common ground fallacy. The parent is asserting that the truth is merely a compromise between two different opinions, when in reality there's evidence enough to assert the truth, without making it a matter of 'right' or 'left' opinion. Their inability to provide their credible sources ("high def video") is because their opinion doesn't align with the reality of the situation.