4 ms·
I've tested JuNest extensively (with the idea of getting new gcc compiler features on a cluster running an old red hat version). Unfortunately, JuNest adds a l
by d-- 9y ago
I've tested JuNest extensively (with the idea of getting new gcc compiler features on a cluster running an old red hat version).
Unfortunately, JuNest adds a lot more overhead than containers. Specifically, when it comes to high-throughput network applications. At 10GBit an application running on JuNest used several cores at 100%, while without JuNest (underlying red hat) the app was at 10% cpu load (network i/o bound).
All that load was due to PRoot.
- da02 9y agoHave you tried with Linux namespaces instead of PRoot? https://github.com/fsquillace/junest#linux-namespaces-based https://github.com/fsquillace/junest#linux-namespaces-based