3 ms·
It still places the content in geographical locations, requiring you to physically travel. It's a form of augmented reality.
by Raphael 9y ago
It still places the content in geographical locations, requiring you to physically travel. It's a form of augmented reality.
- pls2halp 9y agoI think this is the key. Ingress was a successful AR game, and the geolocation was the only AR, no shoddy camera overlay. I think you can draw a parallel to traditional video games, in that games with a general understanding of maps, and not much small-scale definition(MUDs, Civilisation, even 8-bit platforms with no sub-pixel movement) tended to achieve a greater level of achieved complexity by glossing over small details, in the same way that Ingress/Pokemon Go only placed the locations in a general geographic area.
- ajsalminen 9y agoIf this is enough then Google Maps is the most successful application of AR ever.
- slavik81 9y agoI hadn't thought of that aspect as being AR, but I suppose that's true. It's just very limited. The recent Sword Art Online movie spends quite a bit of time imagining what a world with ubiquitous, sophisticated AR could be like. While obviously unrealistic, that movie felt inspiring.