4 ms·
That is not a good analogy. There is an independent board of directors who can keep checks and balances over Musk to make sure he keeps the companies independen
by sumedh 9y ago
That is not a good analogy. There is an independent board of directors who can keep checks and balances over Musk to make sure he keeps the companies independent.
Is there an independent board who can keep a check on the queen?
- unFou 9y agoOnly in so far as the moment a monarch decides to exert any unwelcome authority will be the moment they get deposed. Our monarch performs a ceremonial role as figure-head only. You might call the independent board "Parliament".
- sumedh 9y ago> Only in so far as the moment a monarch decides to exert any unwelcome authority will be the moment they get deposed. How do you know they will get deposed, you are talking about hypothetical situations.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- fit2rule 9y agoTrue fact: Australians can't have an honest conversation about this. The reason is the Secrecy Act. (Corruption of government starts with its secrets, and Australia has .. many .. that would startle its citizens into rebellion, which is what the political system of Australia is truly designed to police, not serve..)
- chrisseaton 9y agoBut you didn't ask about how we keep checks on anything, mate. You just asked how it was possible to be two queen of two independent countries. I can't design analogies to answer questions that you haven't asked, mate, and you can't stretch an analogy from one question to answer any other.
- sumedh 9y ago> You just asked how it was possible to be two queen of two independent countries. They are not independent when you look at from the queen's perspective, she still rules both of them. That is the point.