4 ms·
it seems modern smartphone/watch still can't compete with most complications[0]... Or am I not looking hard enough? [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complic
by unexistance 9y ago
it seems modern smartphone/watch still can't compete with most complications[0]... Or am I not looking hard enough?
[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complication_(horology) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complication_(horology)
- microcolonel 9y agoGiven that a modern smartwatch has on the order of millions of times as many components, arranged very close to the theoretical physical limits of the materials, I don't know how any watchmaker could compete with a silicon lithographer on complexity. Aside: I don't really care for either smartwatches or complex mechanical watches. I want my wristwatch to tell time, and all else being equal, to look good on my skin along with clothing I wear. To me, complexity should drive function and performance, and on that front, nothing competes with a quartz watch with a standard battery (or solid electromechanical drive) in a hand-opening case.
- kwhitefoot 9y agoComplexity and complication are not the same thing.
- sdrothrock 9y agoI'm not following you... what complications do you think an app on a smartphone couldn't replicate? I love mechanical watches, but a smartphone could perform the same work as any complication, as far as I know.