3 ms·
Maybe. To me it simply shows that removing ads is not a big enough benefit make people pay. Which makes sense because people are now used to ads. They will cons
by pryelluw 9y ago
Maybe. To me it simply shows that removing ads is not a big enough benefit make people pay. Which makes sense because people are now used to ads. They will consume the content either way.
- jedberg 9y agoBut we're talking about people who install a program that purposely defrauds advertisers.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- pryelluw 9y agoIm not disagreeing with you. All I'm saying is that the benefit you offer by removing ads as a feature is not big enough to get them to pay. Yes, they do it on purpose. Have you researched why? Is this a symptom and not the problem itself? :)
- ManlyBread 9y agoThere is no fraud, people running the websites have zero say in how I choose to browse the Internet, even if it means automating ad clicks as a means of protest. I could be doing the same manually, but why bother?