3 ms·
One thing that concerns me is, I don't think there was any mention of the sensitivity of the sites listed in the article. For example, the article casually lis
by CaliforniaKarl 9y ago
One thing that concerns me is, I don't think there was any mention of the sensitivity of the sites listed in the article. For example, the article casually listed the Yellowstone caldera.
I wouldn't be surprised if the Lithium-rich sites were significant sites to a significant number of people.
- hwillis 9y agoThere are plenty of very large calderas that are unpopular and already host to mining operations. Much of the west coast is stuff like this. McDermitt Caldera contains over 3 million tons of lithium, for instance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDermitt_Caldera https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDermitt_Caldera