4 ms·
Yes and what I was implying is: It's easy but probably wrong to critisize coming from one side when never faced the other side. It's not easy to be employed but
by thinbeige 9y ago
Yes and what I was implying is: It's easy but probably wrong to critisize coming from one side when never faced the other side. It's not easy to be employed but running a company isn't easier, rather the opposite. Such posts like OP's just focus on one side only and create a very opportunistic mindset where one is good and the other is bad.
I know business is most of the times an opportunistic game but I encountered often enough situations where people and companies didn't act 100% opportunistic. And you remember and recommend those people or companies.
- codingdave 9y agoI didn't take this article as criticism, I took it as self-evaluation of when to leave. So it doesn't seem wrong to me. Employees leaving is just one of the risks a CEO takes on as part of their job. Their role is responsible for building a good place to work, and if they fail at that task, people leave, the company fails, and they don't take home a payout. On the other hand if they succeed, they enjoy greater financial success than the employees. So this article is not unfair criticism from the employee, is is just a manifestation of how risk/rewards balances play out.