3 ms·
"Statistically insignificant" isn't a loose term you can throw around just because the sample size is small. Here's the actual study, FYI: http://journal.front
by mistercow 9y ago
"Statistically insignificant" isn't a loose term you can throw around just because the sample size is small.
Here's the actual study, FYI: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00109/full http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00...
- ikurei 9y agoOk. And your take is that in the original example they show sufficient arguments behind its statistical significance? (honest question, not trying to sound snarky or anything.)
- ikurei 9y ago(PD: I meant "in the original paper".)
- JoBrad 9y ago13 people participated in two nights of sleep. I didn't see anything about a control group, or any control for the day preceding the night of sleep. I tend to agree with this study, because of my personal experience with sound and its affect on my sleep, but I don't think this is anything but a reason to do a more in-depth study.