3 ms·
Of course it's still hackable. There's nothing stopping you from advertising specific prefixes and hijacking all of Youtube traffic globally. https://dyn.com/b
by vitus 9y ago
Of course it's still hackable. There's nothing stopping you from advertising specific prefixes and hijacking all of Youtube traffic globally.
https://dyn.com/blog/pakistan-hijacks-youtube-1/ https://dyn.com/blog/pakistan-hijacks-youtube-1/
Oh wait, that happened almost a decade ago, and there's been no fundamental change to the protocol to protect against that. Except, if you keep something like that in place persistently, nobody will want to peer with you.
* My understanding is that the global hijack was accidental. Pakistan Telecom just wanted to block Youtube traffic internally, and they used a bad mechanism for doing that. Oops.
- notyourday 9y agoOh rubbish. It is not hackable. Proper BGP implementations drop packets with TTL > 1 for non-multihop. This means that the only way to attack BGP between A and B is to have a control of the router on the other side. By doing that one's adversary controls the other side's inbound. It is always the case: Since my outbound is your inbound and since I control my outbound ( by definition ) then you cannot control your inbound. This means that the only defense is filtering.