Yes, exactly. That's why it's worth talking about in the first place. I wasn't downplaying the paper, just observing what I could about the current strength of

Yes, exactly. That's why it's worth talking about in the first place. I wasn't downplaying the paper, just observing what I could about the current strength of its claims. It's more of a Gedankenexperiment with some guiding equations, which it seems the author stated as his intent in the nytimes article.