With comments here, I try to maintain an assumption of good faith as often as possible. Meaning I have to allow and even assume that you're sharing these concer

With comments here, I try to maintain an assumption of good faith as often as possible. Meaning I have to allow and even assume that you're sharing these concerns because you honestly think that the risks are serious enough to justify discouraging any use of this technology. But even though I will assume this, I still think that your information comes from a pipeline with a bad actor somewhere. The omissions and the hyperbole are just too consistent. A while ago I realized that these bad actors have (consciously or unconsciously) stopped arguing as engineers, and that this might be because the "fission answer" is simply one that they do not want to hear. It's a classic case of begging the question - either the answer is a combination of windmills and solar panels, or it can't possibly be an answer. Seeing the same reaction to a random post about an idea for super-tall chimneys really cemented this idea for me: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14933317 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14933317