3 ms·
That's a real problem, but it's still orders of magnitude less harmful than coal. (Also, as a Kentuckian I'm curious what "the equivalent of Kentucky" is.) :)
by PhasmaFelis 9y ago
That's a real problem, but it's still orders of magnitude less harmful than coal.
(Also, as a Kentuckian I'm curious what "the equivalent of Kentucky" is.) :)
- mcv 9y agoNobody is denying that nuclear is less harmful than coal. But for future investments, the comparison should be with solar and wind.
- seszett 9y ago> Also, as a Kentuckian I'm curious what "the equivalent of Kentucky" is. He's probably in Eastern or Northern Europe and talking about Chernobyl.