3 ms·
Very true. In many contexts (ancient, current, and new) the students are painted as an empty receptacle to be filled in with knowledge from some external source
by ivan_ah 9y ago
Very true. In many contexts (ancient, current, and new) the students are painted as an empty receptacle to be filled in with knowledge from some external source. In that world view, innovation is about "filling" students in a more efficient, more controlled, or more measurable way.
Did anyone ever ask what students actually want to learn? Did anyone ever talk to them like adults, and put them in charge of their own learning process?
I think for primary school there needs to be some sort of structure and "guidance from above" but starting with high school, students need to be put in charge. Sure we'll still need some sort of standardized testing and "proof of knowledge," but learning will be so much better if we let students follow their interests and their own pace, possibly working in small groups.
- mjevans 9y agoThere's also the "core" curriculum that needs to be covered, however I see no reason why this can't be paired with the student's actual passion. It's important to give relevance to the work so that it actually matters to the student. In higher education (high school / college / beyond) it would be nice if the work were actually productive to society instead of just busy work.