4 ms·
With 880 Cluster Compute Instances (7040 cores): > This result places us at position 146 on the Top500 list of supercomputers. And $1408 per hour.
by thu 16y ago
With 880 Cluster Compute Instances (7040 cores):
> This result places us at position 146 on the Top500 list of supercomputers.
And $1408 per hour.
- tomjen3 16y agoConsidering how much you would have to pay for the power alone, that doesn't seem unfair.
- mullr 16y agoI wonder how that compares to the cost of booking time on a system of similar class, assuming said systems can be booked?
- c1sc0 16y agoIf it's a one-off computation then a few thousand for a relatively hassle-free setup is bearable for many use cases. I've seen many clusters running idle just because customers initially bought more metal than they could handle. Peak load != continuous load.
- usaar333 16y agoUsing extra large high cpu instances is actually cheaper per compute unit. You just lose io and memory.
- garyrichardson 16y agoExactly. All that compute power may not be useful if you need the io/memory.
- cl3m 16y ago> (1 759.00 / 41.82) * 880 * 1.60 = 59222.1903 And for almost 60k per hour, you will be number 1! How long till AWS as the capacity to top the chart?