2 ms·
This isn't a response. It's a dodge. Instead of responding to the substance of my reply, you've just pivoted to talking about "ridicule", which is a completel
by zzalpha 9y ago
This isn't a response. It's a dodge. Instead of responding to the substance of my reply, you've just pivoted to talking about "ridicule", which is a completely different issue that is only a symptom of the issues in the JS community: the lack of stability and comprehensibility that you seem to be willing to excuse, going so far as to tell people to go elsewhere if they don't like it, without seriously offering up a viable alternative (probably because there isn't one... The web is the web and it's unfortunately unavoidable despite the absurdity it frequently embodies).
So are you choosing not to reflect and respond to my comment? Or did you really just completely miss the point I made?
- erikpukinskis 9y agoI'm not trying to be flip. You didn't really write anything substantive. I'm happy to respond if you want to say something more than "I think what you're describing is ridiculous."