3 ms·
If you want something comprehensible and predictable, go use something else! Reflect upon this comment for a moment. What you just said is, if we want a compr
by zzalpha 9y ago
If you want something comprehensible and predictable, go use something else!
Reflect upon this comment for a moment.
What you just said is, if we want a comprehensible, predictable development ecosystem, we should just use something other than the web.
Do you understand why this rebuttal is a bit ridiculous?
- erikpukinskis 9y agoHonestly, no. I don't see what place ridicule has in a technical discussion.
- zzalpha 9y agoThis isn't a response. It's a dodge. Instead of responding to the substance of my reply, you've just pivoted to talking about "ridicule", which is a completely different issue that is only a symptom of the issues in the JS community: the lack of stability and comprehensibility that you seem to be willing to excuse, going so far as to tell people to go elsewhere if they don't like it, without seriously offering up a viable alternative (probably because there isn't one... The web is the web and it's unfortunately unavoidable despite the absurdity it frequently embodies). So are you choosing not to reflect and respond to my comment? Or did you really just completely miss the point I made?
- erikpukinskis 9y agoI'm not trying to be flip. You didn't really write anything substantive. I'm happy to respond if you want to say something more than "I think what you're describing is ridiculous."