You need to very well understand what you are protesting against, that this monolith of power is not a monolith - more something like a medieval wall, with crac

You need to very well understand what you are protesting against, that this monolith of power is not a monolith - more something like a medieval wall, with cracks and fractures. You need to find these fractures, and apply force only to these weak points, to bring down a avalanch. And then what? Then the machinery will repair itself- replacing damaged careers with new up-jumped individuals and the process will continu. The goal should actually be to understand the nature of humanity, not as in "I-understand-to-feel-self-rightous-about-it", but in a "Know-your-bricks-to-build-a-house" way. There will always be those who claw and crawl for power and control. Taking away that control, for example by a basic income, is percived as hostility towards by that mindset. So protesting for it, will not lead to change. Now, if you state that anyone who recives basic income must join a group- who strives for a endavour, and that the most succesfull of these groups shall be taken as example policy in that sector. You only subtile changed the demand. But you crafted it more compatible to human nature. Suddenly protests can be succesfull.