5 ms·
Hey want to provide some quick clarification on your point. First, you are dramatically, 110% right that pop psychology books plunder really valuable research
by Bucephalus355 9y ago
Hey want to provide some quick clarification on your point.
First, you are dramatically, 110% right that pop psychology books plunder really valuable research such as this for ultimately banal insights that they manage to hide in a 300 page book that could be 10 pages.
K. Anders Ericsson, the absolute giant in the field of expertise research, is quite dismissive of Malcolm Gladwell and upset at his mis-interpretations of his work. Go look at his book, "Peak", which goes into depth on this (and funny enough looks like every other stupid pop psychology book, although it is not).
Finally, if you want to explore the best research we have from the present through the last 40 years, highly recommend you check out "The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise". It's 40 chapters written by nothing but PhDs.
They compare what expertise means across History, Firefighting, Surgery, Ballet, even Truck Driving and Software Design.
- civilian 9y agoGot any links for when K. Anders Ericsson slams Gladwell? Was it in a blog post or a podcast or something?
- Bucephalus355 9y agoJust looked at the physical book. I work in DevOps but just in general want to say physical books are great and highly underrated for how quickly you can access info / other things. https://www.dropbox.com/s/mqmmlf1jpdexmav/Gladwell-Peak.jpeg?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/mqmmlf1jpdexmav/Gladwell-Peak.jpeg... Lol you'll see in the comments I even wrote "hates Gladwell!". In fairness to Ericsson, he is very civil and it's a very respectable "takedown".