4 ms·
I mainly use Wappalyser, after finding it to be more reliable than BuiltWith, but I've given this a quick go on some of the sites I work on, and I have the foll
by EnderMB 9y ago
I mainly use Wappalyser, after finding it to be more reliable than BuiltWith, but I've given this a quick go on some of the sites I work on, and I have the following feedback:
1. All in all, this looks really tidy, so nice work!
2. Sadly, it looks a bit limited on detecting anything .NET/Windows. I pointed it at a few Umbraco sites running on Azure, and none of it was picked up.
3. It doesn't look like it works for subdomains.
4. Wappalyser does a good job of detecting Angular 2, whereas this seems to struggle.
These issues aside, I'll probably keep it running at work, and if these things can be resolved I can see this being my preferred choice.
- jijosunny 9y agoAwesome. Thank you so much for your kind words. Addressing your concerns, 1. Thank you ;) 2. Devs are looking into this. Neglecting .Net/Windows wasn't intentional. We will work on this. 3. Yes, WR currently considers subdomains as a part of the main domain. Most users like to know the full tech stack of a website. If there is a blog at blog.company.com and if it is using Intercom, it can be a useful data. I hope this makes sense. Anyway, we will definitely address this concern and think about adding an option for subdomain separation. 4. Noted!
- travmatt 9y agoI had seen wappalyzer recommended in the context of webapp pen testing and have used it since - Is recommend it as well