3 ms·
That's true but easier than arguing the previous precedents are wrong. Or so wrong, it would override the weight of them being a precedent. The idea that the r
by akvadrako 9y ago
That's true but easier than arguing the previous precedents are wrong. Or so wrong, it would override the weight of them being a precedent.
The idea that the right to privacy implies the right to perform abortion seems like the weakest point to me. That argument only seems plausible if the right to privacy implies we can do anything to ourselves in private.
That's a ridiculous amount of power for a right which isn't even explicitly mentioned and way outside the Federal government's mandate. Not to mention inconsistent with many laws.
- lisper 9y ago> That argument only seems plausible if the right to privacy implies we can do anything to ourselves in private. Is that not the case?