3 ms·
"In 2009, NASA crashed a rocket and a satellite into a crater on the moon’s south pole, in the hopes of picking up additional watery evidence. " NO, In 2008 IS
by Abishek_Muthian 9y ago
"In 2009, NASA crashed a rocket and a satellite into a crater on the moon’s south pole, in the hopes of picking up additional watery evidence. "
NO, In 2008 ISRO crashed Moon Impact Probe (MIP) into lunar surface as part of Chandrayaan-I mission. MIP didn't have any specific role, other than political agenda. The NASA's Moon Minerology Mapper M3 onboard of the Chandrayaan spacecraft was instrumental in providing the first mineralogical map of the lunar surface.
Quoting S. Pete Worden, center director at NASA’s Ames Research Center :
“NASA missions like Lunar Prospector and the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite and instruments like M3 have gathered crucial data that fundamentally changed our understanding of whether water exists on the surface of the moon,”
National Geographic, having titled the article - 'Get the facts' and blatantly ignoring ISRO's contribution is not healthy.
The reason I brought this up is not to score nationalist brownie points, but a credit where it's due. In a country like India, where an organisation like ISRO instills scientific termparment over large population; ignoring it's contribution by global media focussed on science is an insult to entire scientific community.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- bb611 9y agoI think you're right to ask for credit where it's due, but this is not such a place - the event being referenced is the 2009 LCROSS mission: http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/10/09/probe.moon.crash/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/10/09/probe.moon.crash/in... I discovered this with a very quick google search of the terms "2009 NASA crash moon"
- Abishek_Muthian 9y agoYou are right,the specific case about 2009 crash could be of NASA spacecraft. But what about the entire context of the article ?