4 ms·
I wonder why it matters so much that the C# tools weren't open source? Given the BizSpark program gives you them for close to free (and express versions are fre
by rodh257 16y ago
I wonder why it matters so much that the C# tools weren't open source? Given the BizSpark program gives you them for close to free (and express versions are free) what does it matter that he doesn't have the source code?
The article didn't really go into the depth that I was hoping for, wanted to hear things about not just the performance but how hard it is to hire/learn the certain language, hosting costs, best agile tools etc.
- runevault 16y agoTo my mind it's the entire stack that makes it a problem. For example if you don't feel comfortable using Mono, you also have to deal with Windows for your OS, better experience with SQL server, etc. Even if you use Bizspark to make the up front cost trivial to non-existent, you still have to use those specific technologies. How many of the types of people who are tech people founding startups prefer their servers on Windows? I sure don't, even though my day to day desktop life is there. It just doesn't feel right. But maybe that's just because my prefered languages for personal use/etc are at least arguably better on *nix environments (Python works well in Windows, but Clojure's not nearly as good, at least once you factor in a lot of the popular tools like Lein).
- troygoode 16y agoBizSpark/WebSpark are only free for a certain amount of time (3 years, I think), after which you'll have to start paying for the licenses you're still using. Also, the Express versions of Studio are quite crippled - fine for hobby work, but not worthwhile for an actual startup where you're going to be working in the tool for hours every day.