6 ms·

Why is humanity's survival important?

kbenson 9y ago
It's important for the exact same reason you're able to ask that question. Without humanity, who asks why? Humanity is, to the best of our knowledge, the best and possibly only chance of increasing understanding of the universe. I care about that, as well as about our species generally in what is likely an evolved and chemically reinforced way. At some point that may be less true, and I would care less (but would still care). At a meta level, if you truly don't care about the survival of your species (even if only through the survival of your own relatives and loved ones), you're an evolutionary dead end.
- wellboy 9y ago
  Survival of humanity isn't important universally. The universe doesn't care. But it's the most important thing for humans.
  - ars 9y ago
    > The universe doesn't care. And that's exactly why it's important. > Survival of humanity isn't important universally. Unless there is something there that cares about it, there is little reason for the universe to exist - nothing would know the difference. Which is why it actually is important universally. > But it's the most important thing for humans. No, it's more important for the universe to have humans, than it is for humans to have a universe. If the universe did not have humans (or another sentients) then it might as well not exist. AKA: Humans super important to the universe. If humans did not have a universe, then humans would not exist. If humans did not exist then nothing is important to them.
    - wellboy 9y ago
      Why are you saying that the universe might not exist if it were not for humans. I have a few questions for you. 1. What if humans become extinct in a few hundred years? Should the universe then not exist anymore and make more lifeforms? 2. What if there are billions of other "intelligent" species in the universe? Why should the universe care about one specific species that is actually not that great, and very destructive. 3. What if this universe is just an experiment, a petridish and we are just one out of billions of parameters. 4. What if our kind of intelligence is really not that impressive, what if intelligence of dark matter entities, which we don't know about anything is much more powerful, what if even that is not that impressive? Again, the universe doesn't care. It is not a person, it doesn't have a plan, it is neutral, unless we met our "gods" one day. Humans are just a blip among much larger things that are happening in the universe.
      - ars 9y ago
        > Why are you saying that the universe might not exist if it were not for humans. I didn't say that. I said there is no difference between a universe not existing, and one that has no one who notices that it exists. Re: 1 and 2 I said "(or another sentients)". 3: I guess you are implying someone made the universe and is running it? In that case, they are the ones aware of it, so that counts. 4: Hu?? What are dark matter entities? We notice the universe and care that it exists. That's enough. The specific level of intelligence, (or aggression for that matter) does not matter. > Again, the universe doesn't care. That's the point. WE care, and we are the ones that give the universe a "voice" as you will. We speak for it, we do the "caring" for it. Without us (or other sentients) it might as well not not exist. > Humans are just a blip among much larger things that are happening in the universe. Just because someone is big doesn't make it important. Importance comes from meaning. A really big explosion in space, that does noting at all, is completely unimportant. While a tiny little seed that someone wanted to plant matters a lot.
    - khedoros1 9y ago
      That seems like a circular argument. It's not important for the universe to have a purpose, or to "care"...except to us. Things don't need a reason to exist.
      - ars 9y ago
        What is the difference between a universe that doesn't exist, and one that no one notices exists? There is no difference.
        khedoros1 9y ago
        The difference is itself: one universe exists, one doesn't. Notice doesn't define existence. Measurability doesn't define existence. Meaning doesn't define existence.
  - Devid2014 9y ago
    I care and I am part of this universe, like you and every other human on this planet. So at lest partially universe care about humanity.
    - deathhand 9y ago
      "We are the universe experiencing itself"
- ribosometronome 9y ago
  It sounds like you value the persistence of understanding in a way that just isn't particularly important to me. The survival of my loved ones -- and that's a category that can go across species -- is absolutely important to me. The survival of evil space Nazis? Eh. That said, I also don't really think I see being an evolutionary dead end as too huge of a concern. Many of us appreciate things that aren't truly keen from an evolutionary perspective. Consider how many of us will remain happily childless (perhaps not yourself) well into our 30s and beyond. Not amazing for propagating our own personal genes and yet, they're decisions we actively and happily make.
  - kbenson 9y ago
    > The survival of my loved ones -- and that's a category that can go across species -- is absolutely important to me. The survival of evil space Nazis? Eh. The idea is that if it's between all people dead, or all people except evil space Nazis, I'll take evil space Nazis. Just because they are evil space Nazis now doesn't mean they will be hundreds of years from now, but they'll never get that chance if all humans are gone. Human history is largely a story about bigoted, insular racist violent psychopaths becoming slightly less of each of those things over time. I don't see why that trend won't continue in general even if we hit a local maxima of fascist oppression from time to time (as this would be). Because I love people, I can understand the concept of loving people in general, and want other people to be able to experience that. Human extinction means that nobody might ever experience that again, and I think that's a shame, and will do what I can to prevent that type of outcome. > Many of us appreciate things that aren't truly keen from an evolutionary perspective. There isn't appreciation of that type without people to do the appreciating. Your ability to appreciate it is provided by our current circumstances. I think keeping those circumstances active is worthwhile. Otherwise you are taking more than you are giving to the species as a whole, which is unsustainable if too many people do so. Even if you don't care about how sustainable it is, you would be riding on the hard work the rest of the species is putting into the system to propagate. Don't be taker.
    - Endy 9y ago
      If it's up to me between no humans and evil space Nazis? I'll take no humans every time. We're a stain on the face of existence, we pollute and destroy our environment, we abuse our own species and others as a matter of course, and we're just overall destructive. The only thing that changes that is that sometimes one or two people rise up and decide that they will resist that status quo and do something about it. To allow a group of people who are evil in the conception of a default-destructive species to be the only ones left? Better to let the species die.
ethbro 9y ago
Because the universe drives towards increased complexity. Solar fusion creates heavier elements. Gas clouds collapse into stars and planets. Life, while insignificant on a mass scale, nonetheless represents one of the greatest increases in complexity and diversity the universe has thus far produced. For that reason alone, it's sacred, and should be cherished.
logfromblammo 9y ago
To date, humanity has been the only species with a demonstrated ability to reliably lift portions of the Earth ecosystem out of the planetary gravity well. It is therefore essential to creating self-sustaining spores filled with Earth-life. Humanity must survive if Earth-life is to survive. As such, humanity also gets to pick the species (or subspecies) that get included in the spores. Autotrophic algae will likely get a guaranteed berth on the ship, whereas elephants are going to have to breed themselves down smaller and smarter if they want off this rock.
xweb 9y ago
Pipe down, Skynet.
beaconstudios 9y ago
why would it not be? Life exists to create more of itself. We inherently want there to be more of us.
wan23 9y ago
It's literally the definition of the word: of great significance or value; likely to have a profound effect on success, survival, or well-being

It's important for the exact same reason you're able to ask that question. Without humanity, who asks why? Humanity is, to the best of our knowledge, the best and possibly only chance of increasing understanding of the universe. I care about that, as well as about our species generally in what is likely an evolved and chemically reinforced way. At some point that may be less true, and I would care less (but would still care). At a meta level, if you truly don't care about the survival of your species (even if only through the survival of your own relatives and loved ones), you're an evolutionary dead end.

wellboy 9y ago
Survival of humanity isn't important universally. The universe doesn't care. But it's the most important thing for humans.
- ars 9y ago
  > The universe doesn't care. And that's exactly why it's important. > Survival of humanity isn't important universally. Unless there is something there that cares about it, there is little reason for the universe to exist - nothing would know the difference. Which is why it actually is important universally. > But it's the most important thing for humans. No, it's more important for the universe to have humans, than it is for humans to have a universe. If the universe did not have humans (or another sentients) then it might as well not exist. AKA: Humans super important to the universe. If humans did not have a universe, then humans would not exist. If humans did not exist then nothing is important to them.
  - wellboy 9y ago
    Why are you saying that the universe might not exist if it were not for humans. I have a few questions for you. 1. What if humans become extinct in a few hundred years? Should the universe then not exist anymore and make more lifeforms? 2. What if there are billions of other "intelligent" species in the universe? Why should the universe care about one specific species that is actually not that great, and very destructive. 3. What if this universe is just an experiment, a petridish and we are just one out of billions of parameters. 4. What if our kind of intelligence is really not that impressive, what if intelligence of dark matter entities, which we don't know about anything is much more powerful, what if even that is not that impressive? Again, the universe doesn't care. It is not a person, it doesn't have a plan, it is neutral, unless we met our "gods" one day. Humans are just a blip among much larger things that are happening in the universe.
    - ars 9y ago
      > Why are you saying that the universe might not exist if it were not for humans. I didn't say that. I said there is no difference between a universe not existing, and one that has no one who notices that it exists. Re: 1 and 2 I said "(or another sentients)". 3: I guess you are implying someone made the universe and is running it? In that case, they are the ones aware of it, so that counts. 4: Hu?? What are dark matter entities? We notice the universe and care that it exists. That's enough. The specific level of intelligence, (or aggression for that matter) does not matter. > Again, the universe doesn't care. That's the point. WE care, and we are the ones that give the universe a "voice" as you will. We speak for it, we do the "caring" for it. Without us (or other sentients) it might as well not not exist. > Humans are just a blip among much larger things that are happening in the universe. Just because someone is big doesn't make it important. Importance comes from meaning. A really big explosion in space, that does noting at all, is completely unimportant. While a tiny little seed that someone wanted to plant matters a lot.
  - khedoros1 9y ago
    That seems like a circular argument. It's not important for the universe to have a purpose, or to "care"...except to us. Things don't need a reason to exist.
    - ars 9y ago
      What is the difference between a universe that doesn't exist, and one that no one notices exists? There is no difference.
      - khedoros1 9y ago
        The difference is itself: one universe exists, one doesn't. Notice doesn't define existence. Measurability doesn't define existence. Meaning doesn't define existence.
- Devid2014 9y ago
  I care and I am part of this universe, like you and every other human on this planet. So at lest partially universe care about humanity.
  - deathhand 9y ago
    "We are the universe experiencing itself"
ribosometronome 9y ago
It sounds like you value the persistence of understanding in a way that just isn't particularly important to me. The survival of my loved ones -- and that's a category that can go across species -- is absolutely important to me. The survival of evil space Nazis? Eh. That said, I also don't really think I see being an evolutionary dead end as too huge of a concern. Many of us appreciate things that aren't truly keen from an evolutionary perspective. Consider how many of us will remain happily childless (perhaps not yourself) well into our 30s and beyond. Not amazing for propagating our own personal genes and yet, they're decisions we actively and happily make.
- kbenson 9y ago
  > The survival of my loved ones -- and that's a category that can go across species -- is absolutely important to me. The survival of evil space Nazis? Eh. The idea is that if it's between all people dead, or all people except evil space Nazis, I'll take evil space Nazis. Just because they are evil space Nazis now doesn't mean they will be hundreds of years from now, but they'll never get that chance if all humans are gone. Human history is largely a story about bigoted, insular racist violent psychopaths becoming slightly less of each of those things over time. I don't see why that trend won't continue in general even if we hit a local maxima of fascist oppression from time to time (as this would be). Because I love people, I can understand the concept of loving people in general, and want other people to be able to experience that. Human extinction means that nobody might ever experience that again, and I think that's a shame, and will do what I can to prevent that type of outcome. > Many of us appreciate things that aren't truly keen from an evolutionary perspective. There isn't appreciation of that type without people to do the appreciating. Your ability to appreciate it is provided by our current circumstances. I think keeping those circumstances active is worthwhile. Otherwise you are taking more than you are giving to the species as a whole, which is unsustainable if too many people do so. Even if you don't care about how sustainable it is, you would be riding on the hard work the rest of the species is putting into the system to propagate. Don't be taker.
  - Endy 9y ago
    If it's up to me between no humans and evil space Nazis? I'll take no humans every time. We're a stain on the face of existence, we pollute and destroy our environment, we abuse our own species and others as a matter of course, and we're just overall destructive. The only thing that changes that is that sometimes one or two people rise up and decide that they will resist that status quo and do something about it. To allow a group of people who are evil in the conception of a default-destructive species to be the only ones left? Better to let the species die.

ethbro 9y ago

Because the universe drives towards increased complexity. Solar fusion creates heavier elements. Gas clouds collapse into stars and planets. Life, while insignificant on a mass scale, nonetheless represents one of the greatest increases in complexity and diversity the universe has thus far produced. For that reason alone, it's sacred, and should be cherished.

logfromblammo 9y ago

To date, humanity has been the only species with a demonstrated ability to reliably lift portions of the Earth ecosystem out of the planetary gravity well. It is therefore essential to creating self-sustaining spores filled with Earth-life. Humanity must survive if Earth-life is to survive. As such, humanity also gets to pick the species (or subspecies) that get included in the spores. Autotrophic algae will likely get a guaranteed berth on the ship, whereas elephants are going to have to breed themselves down smaller and smarter if they want off this rock.

xweb 9y ago

Pipe down, Skynet.

beaconstudios 9y ago

why would it not be? Life exists to create more of itself. We inherently want there to be more of us.

wan23 9y ago

It's literally the definition of the word: of great significance or value; likely to have a profound effect on success, survival, or well-being