4 ms·
The burden of proof isn't on the claim there is no practical usage. The default hypothesis is no usage. The burden of proof is on the claim that non-speculatio
by avaer 9y ago
The burden of proof isn't on the claim there is no practical usage. The default hypothesis is no usage.
The burden of proof is on the claim that non-speculation uses are greater than the speculation uses.
- mrb 9y ago"The default hypothesis is no usage." Says who? I agree speculators are a big fraction of crypto users, but you are making the even bolder claim that "crypto currencies are not practically used". Consider that lots of hard & anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15094514 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15094514
- lolsal 9y ago> Says who? Says the burden of proof. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof