3 ms·
The provided licence is a discriminatory licence that favours only one party - Facebook. I believe that it could not be called an open licence. Author argues t
by eveningcoffee 9y ago
The provided licence is a discriminatory licence that favours only one party - Facebook. I believe that it could not be called an open licence.
Author argues that the situation is not that bad and it is still somehow an open licence or even when not then it is still acceptable. I believe that it is neither of them.