I think this point would be more relevant to something like the modified question proposed by jbob2000: > It's an interesting idea executed poorly. What if we

I think this point would be more relevant to something like the modified question proposed by jbob2000: > It's an interesting idea executed poorly. What if we changed it to: "1000 people were asked how many lights were lit up in a row of 4 lit up lights. 900 people said there were 4 lights." But in the case of color identification, I feel like 10% disagreement is par for the course -- it doesn't imply anything weird is going on.