5 ms·
It wouldn't really be relevant. For why, read The Moon is a Harsh Mistress. TLDR: The moon colony will be able to make its own rules and keep earth at bay.
by rothbardrand 9y ago
It wouldn't really be relevant. For why, read The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
TLDR: The moon colony will be able to make its own rules and keep earth at bay.
- jfolkins 9y agoOne of my all time favorite books. I like how the power roles between the sexes on the moon are reversed too. The matriarch has all the power because women are scarce and they take on many husbands out of this need. They always hold the cards and culturally everyone accepts this. Also, because the value of women is so high no man ever dares attack one less they be sent out an airlock. It is cultural justice. No trial. A man just knows that if he is seen assaulting a woman, he is dead. The community can't afford to lose a single female. Plus with all the talk of the A.I. Armageddon the book plays right into that discussion.
- pm90 9y agoMany societies have historically been matriarchal. It just happened that Christianity, Islam (maybe Judaism? not sure...) were patriarchal and societies that embraces these religions came to dominate most of the other society/ peoples. I do hope the future will be more "centrist", neither patriarchal nor matriarchal.
- bluGill 9y agoThe American west was once very lopsided as well, males became cowboys and the women rarely traveled west. In one generation the few women out west had equal numbers of both gender kids and now that history is not important to the culture. The book is interesting, but it was written for a society that doesn't exist. Women and men will not be as lopsided in a colony. The first few ships might be mostly male construction workers, but after that expect to see a much closer balance.
- yulaow 9y agoWill be in how much time? Considering the first man who went to the moon needed to place a national flag on it asap, I think we are risking a serious conflict and IF we could avoid it better we do whatever is possible BEFORE having people fighting directly on the moon.
- neaden 9y agoI'm sorry but this is just silly. Just because something happened in a novel published more than 50 years ago does not at all make it likely to happen in real life. The Moon is much less habitable than we thought it would be in the 60s, meaning any moon colony will be very dependent on the Earth for the foreseeable future and the rock launcher wouldn't be bulidable with the kind of infrastructure in the novel.
- valuearb 9y agoThe point is it's really hard to impose laws and forms of government on peoples living days or months away from you. Sooner or later they'll want to make their own.
- neaden 9y agoSays who? Plenty of empires had people living that far without rebellions breaking out. Yeah the US rebelled against Britain but Canada, Australia, and a bunch of other places didn't. Hell, most of England was more than a couple days away from London for most of English history without breaking away. Let alone a larger country like China.
- valuearb 9y agoHow much of the British Empire still reports to Britain?
- logfromblammo 9y agoSame lesson as KSRobinson's Mars series. Same lesson as the United States secession and rebellion against Great Britain. You make the government local, or the local government that eventually forms will rebel. Then it will beat you, because it can react to the local situation more quickly. You might be able to control the Moon from Earth, but Mars will definitely be self-governing. It's all about the latency.
- neaden 9y ago