5 ms·
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-dreamhost-idUSKCN1B41ZC https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-dreamhost-idUSK... The warrant has been appro
by notyourday 9y ago
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-dreamhost-idUSKCN1B41ZC https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-dreamhost-idUSK...
The warrant has been approved.
- jdp23 9y agoThanks for the update. That's probably worthy of a top-level thread of its own!
- ceejayoz 9y agoWierd. They'd supposedly dropped the request yesterday. http://gizmodo.com/justice-department-drops-request-for-ip-addresses-of-1-1798325300 http://gizmodo.com/justice-department-drops-request-for-ip-a...
- jdp23 9y agoThey dropped the request for the IP addresses, but actually broadened what they were looking for. National Law Journal had one of the better articles on this at http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202796292903/DreamHost-Lawyer-Balks-at-DOJ-Modifications-to-Search-Warrant http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202796292903/DreamHost...
- openasocket 9y agoThe title to that article is misleading. They didn't drop the request, they changed it to limit the scope. If you read the changes, they are no longer requests HTTP request and response logs, but rather published content on the site and any transactions.