3 ms·
Would a monitor do it for you? I've got a 32" monitor that cost about $500, and it doesn't have any smart features whatsoever, not even a video camera. It's not
by Kluny 9y ago
Would a monitor do it for you? I've got a 32" monitor that cost about $500, and it doesn't have any smart features whatsoever, not even a video camera. It's not as big as most people's living room TVs seem to be, but it's enough for my taste. If I wanted a really massive screen, I guess I'd get a projector.
This assumes that you've got a small computer handy for delivering content, but a chromecast or a roku or all kinds of other things could probably do the trick for that.
- phkahler 9y ago>> Would a monitor do it for you? That's funny because I've been planning to but a TV for use as a monitor. Looking for 4K UHD curved 55" with 4:4:4 of course. This would be like having 4 (2x2) 27" 1080p monitors, including having them angled inward. I figure my desktop would be partitioned into 3 columns each 1280 wide, so playing 720p video would be 1/9 of the screen space.
- Kluny 9y agoI'm told that TVs have lower refresh rates that make them unsuitable to use as monitors. Have you looked into that? Maybe it's only relevant if you're gaming.