There's an inalienable right to water to the extent that a government would be tyrannical because people didn't have water. I can imagine a few different scenar

There's an inalienable right to water to the extent that a government would be tyrannical because people didn't have water. I can imagine a few different scenarios where that would be the case. The "right to life" was more broadly talking about who owns a life (the individual, nature's creator, not the government). It wasn't talking about the right to be free of all death.