On any measure you look at nuclear is superior. It kills less people, it uses less land, it uses less resources, it uses less mining and so on. Areas of nucle

On any measure you look at nuclear is superior. It kills less people, it uses less land, it uses less resources, it uses less mining and so on. Areas of nuclear fallout and in protection zones are actually reclaimed by nature and animals don't give a shit about living there. Environmentalist should love nuclear. There is that movement called 'eco-modernist' who subscribe to that. > nuclear accidents that are devastating to life Hardly. Most of the people that were evacuated were not in danger, devastating to their live was government action because of fear mongering. Far more people died of the evacuation then of the radiation. People are again living in cities near Chernobyl and their cancer rates are not unusual.