I thought the issue was that the machine is inaccurate (although I understand there was always a certain amount of accuracy with ML) Wasnt the real issue: "The

I thought the issue was that the machine is inaccurate (although I understand there was always a certain amount of accuracy with ML) Wasnt the real issue: "The researchers’ paper includes a photo of a man at a stove labeled “woman.” as stated in the article? Thus isnt this article rather calling for an improvement in the system and simply stating that the data coming in is not as good because systems are also heavily influenced by data or as they say garbage data generates garbage results.