Thank you, this was excellent and very informative. You weren't kidding about the lambda calculus definition! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda_calculus#Fo

Thank you, this was excellent and very informative. You weren't kidding about the lambda calculus definition! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda_calculus#Formal_definition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda_calculus#Formal_definit... With that said, your comment seems quite technical, about the single point of simplicity. You don't talk much about Go at all, and although the other poster has also answered, I'd be curious in your answer as well (if you've worked with Go): You've given a definition of simplicity (correcting mine). Did you find Go simple? What other thoughts did you have?