3 ms·
This is what I'm seeing as well. Seems like the only mistake the author made was forgetting to include the MIT license, which is not as nefarious as scrubbing i
by atarian 9y ago
This is what I'm seeing as well. Seems like the only mistake the author made was forgetting to include the MIT license, which is not as nefarious as scrubbing it.
- bhhaskin 9y agoI don't think you need to include the MIT license if the source code is not included.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- steveklabnik 9y ago> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. There's no distinction between source and binary code.
- mikeash 9y agoBut there is a distinction between redistributing a work and merely referencing it. It doesn't look like this repository actually copies anything from the other, and just listing the other one as a dependency doesn't require including the license.