3 ms·

So, speaking for Google (for once): We're on it (and about to post a response), but a number of us have looked at this, and having trouble finding any actual co

So, speaking for Google (for once): We're on it (and about to post a response), but a number of us have looked at this, and having trouble finding any actual code in common between the repos at all (let alone any where the license was changed). I can find parts that depend on the gemstash project being installed, but nothing that appears to actually have been taken from the gemstash project . I'd someone here sees some, i'd really appreciate letting us know (here, or email me at dannyb@google) so we can go fix it.

PappaPatat 9y ago
Nothing to find as far as i can see. All that's done is import a gem like anyone would who's project who depends on an external gem. Mr. Indirect seems to have had a bad day, take it easy :)] Edit: Seems more just a google criticaster https://indirect.tumblr.com/post/164152747613/so-ive-been-thinking-about-this-google-manifesto https://indirect.tumblr.com/post/164152747613/so-ive-been-th...
- Gigablah 9y ago
  That's not the same @indirect.
  - andars 9y ago
    https://github.com/indirect https://github.com/indirect links to http://arko.net/ http://arko.net/, which links to http://indirect.tumblr.com/ http://indirect.tumblr.com/.
    - Gigablah 9y ago
      Ah, I stand corrected, looks like the blog belongs to him, but the article itself was written by someone else (@williampietri).
unfunco 9y ago
I mean it's a stretch, but most of the lines in the .gitignore from the first commit, compared with Gemstash now, are similar. https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserver/commit/36f0b9127baca14c24e40047b22f7117f9edb07b https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserve... https://github.com/bundler/gemstash/blob/master/.gitignore https://github.com/bundler/gemstash/blob/master/.gitignore I hope Google can afford a good lawyer!
- Ajedi32 9y ago
  Those are some pretty standard ignore lines for a Ruby project. Probably both taken from a common template.
rhapsodic 9y ago
It looks like @indirect has admitted he made a mistake, apologized, and closed the issue: https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserver/issues/36#issuecomment-324503159 https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserve...
DannyBee 9y ago
As an update looks like he thinks he was wrong. As Max said, mistakes happen, and most people are not very willing to publicly admit when they make them, so I'm generally very supportive of anyone who is willing to do that move on.

PappaPatat 9y ago

Nothing to find as far as i can see. All that's done is import a gem like anyone would who's project who depends on an external gem. Mr. Indirect seems to have had a bad day, take it easy :)] Edit: Seems more just a google criticaster https://indirect.tumblr.com/post/164152747613/so-ive-been-thinking-about-this-google-manifesto https://indirect.tumblr.com/post/164152747613/so-ive-been-th...

Gigablah 9y ago
That's not the same @indirect.
- andars 9y ago
  https://github.com/indirect https://github.com/indirect links to http://arko.net/ http://arko.net/, which links to http://indirect.tumblr.com/ http://indirect.tumblr.com/.
  - Gigablah 9y ago
    Ah, I stand corrected, looks like the blog belongs to him, but the article itself was written by someone else (@williampietri).

unfunco 9y ago

I mean it's a stretch, but most of the lines in the .gitignore from the first commit, compared with Gemstash now, are similar. https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserver/commit/36f0b9127baca14c24e40047b22f7117f9edb07b https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserve... https://github.com/bundler/gemstash/blob/master/.gitignore https://github.com/bundler/gemstash/blob/master/.gitignore I hope Google can afford a good lawyer!

Ajedi32 9y ago
Those are some pretty standard ignore lines for a Ruby project. Probably both taken from a common template.

rhapsodic 9y ago

It looks like @indirect has admitted he made a mistake, apologized, and closed the issue: https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserver/issues/36#issuecomment-324503159 https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserve...

DannyBee 9y ago

As an update looks like he thinks he was wrong. As Max said, mistakes happen, and most people are not very willing to publicly admit when they make them, so I'm generally very supportive of anyone who is willing to do that move on.