4 ms·
The intern represents Google in all regards and actions.
by movedx 9y ago
The intern represents Google in all regards and actions.
- Flammy 9y agoHe just didn't know it... https://ca.linkedin.com/in/[redacted] https://ca.linkedin.com/in/[redacted] But really, I hope the dude doesn't get in too much trouble over this and can use it as a (moderately high profile) learning opportunity.
- Waterluvian 9y agoRepresenting the company you work for, when doing your job at that company, is fundamental to the employee/employer relationship.
- izacus 9y agoAnd the whole point of being an intern is to learn these things.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- ProAm 9y ago"Ignorance of the law excuses no man." - Seldon
- rcfox 9y agoThere's no need to dox the kid.
- rhapsodic 9y ago>There's no need to dox the kid. Linking to someone's linkedin page is not doxxing. That's information about himself he freely chose to make publicly available. It's linked from his github profile, which is two links away from the the Github issue that is the subject of this post. Doxxing would be revealing his home address, phone number, private email, etc.
- cosinetau 9y agoWhy are you providing a link to this person's LinkedIn? This IS NOT a place to provide material for a witchhunt.
- rhapsodic 9y ago>Why are you providing a link to this person's LinkedIn? This IS NOT a place to provide material for a witchhunt. If someone wanted to launch a witch hunt, it wouldn't take long for them to find his linkedin page on their own. The linkedin page is relevant because it provides verification that he is in fact a Google intern.
- dang 9y agoPlease don't bring in someone's personal details into a discussion like this. That's outside the kind of site we're trying for here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. We redacted the name from the comment above.
- Gigablah 9y agoCould you change the title to something more neutral? E.g. "Gemstash project owner accuses Google intern of violating their MIT license"? From the discussion on the Github issues page it's starting to look like a mistake (last two posts): https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserver/issues/36 https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserve...
- dang 9y agoGood point; we should have done that earlier. I've changed the title to that of the page and put quotes around it to indicate that it's disputed. (Submitted title was "Google intern violates the MIT license of Gemstash".) Edit: I also updated the URL from https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserver/issues/36 https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserve... to the post that indicates the issue was a mistake. Seems only fair.