5 ms·
and we can't even get people to agree that there's a problem. and we have no leadership to guide our response. and we can't winnow our way out of this alone.
by cryoshon 9y ago
and we can't even get people to agree that there's a problem.
and we have no leadership to guide our response.
and we can't winnow our way out of this alone.
what now?
- crush-n-spread 9y agoLook at it this way. A large swath of people believe it is a problem and most of them are willing to put time and money in counteracting it. We have leaders like Elon Musk already creating a great response. We can't winnow out of it alone but we already have leaders & a large group of people interested in fixing it. The answer to "what now" is start a company that is in the business of carbon sequestration or climate affect mitigation and become a leader. It's obvious!
- mAdamTus 9y agoCivilization collapses and we begin the glacially slow, many thousand year process of extinction.
- nyxtom 9y agoConsider how lucky we are to even have spent any time at all to reach a point in the cosmos to make this realization. Even if humanity manages to survive past this problem, there are many more including the overconsumption of the world's finite resources. Perhaps it is inevitable given a biological imperative to be selfish. Our means of survival in future generations may be determined by our ability to adapt to withering resources, reuse of existing and exploring space for more. Consider the issue of water reuse; some amount of research suggests that graphene filters when they come to fruition may help with far more reuse and recycle of water. Other work such as the electric transport systems, high speed hyperloops, and 3D print manufacturing combined with a closed loop system may help bring down massive resource waste. There is a lot of tech to be hopeful of but it won't be all positive. Many of it seems to be adaptations to a world which is constantly at risk for extinction