3 ms·
This article just seems odd. They're still quoting numbers from how they compared 2 years ago to Kepler GPUs. Unless they have a new TPU out, these are worse th
by shaklee3 9y ago
This article just seems odd. They're still quoting numbers from how they compared 2 years ago to Kepler GPUs. Unless they have a new TPU out, these are worse than the V100 GPU out today, so it's strange that in a field moving so fast they're constantly quoting old data. It doesn't matter anymore that you had the fastest chip in 2015. If you haven't iterated since then, you are probably losing.
- jorgemf 9y agoThe link is about TPUv1, but Google is already using TPUv2 (or maybe TPUv3, they don't talk too much about this things).
- digitalzombie 9y agoBottom of article the author missed out on the TPU v2 talk. TPU v2 is in alpha stage right now but if you're a research you can apply to use it over at google cloud service.