8 ms·
I'm guessing it will optimize for dedicated bike paths since you shouldn't be riding your bike on the sidewalk.
by Facemelters 9y ago
I'm guessing it will optimize for dedicated bike paths since you shouldn't be riding your bike on the sidewalk.
- Spivak 9y agoIf we added bike lanes to sidewalks rather than roads I think it would solve a lot of the complaints motorists have.
- pavel_lishin 9y agoBut it wouldn't solve many of the complaints that bicyclists and pedestrians have.
- futurix 9y agoAnd raise an even larger amount of complaints from pedestrians.
- ucaetano 9y agoThat's done in Europe, where sidewalks are wide enough. Most sidewalks in the US aren't wide enough to include a bike lane.
- rhinoceraptor 9y agoRiding a bike on the sidewalk (or a divided bike path) is actually pretty dangerous. Cars aren't expecting there to be 15-25 mph traffic when they pull in to driveways or make turns. The most common type of bike accidents are cars failing to yield when turning or using driveways, and divided bike paths and sidewalks only make it worse. I try to be super vigilant when crossing crosswalks and driveways when using the sidewalk, but pretty much all of the close calls I've had have been because I was riding moderately fast on the sidewalk.
- MBlume 9y agoWe should take land away from motorists, not from pedestrians.
- icebraining 9y agoYeah, but that's a separate matter, you can simply widen the sidewalk into the road to add the cycling lane.
- MBlume 9y agoYeah, sure, that's cool
- twobyfour 9y agoGood god, please no! The most harrowing pedestrian segment of my commute isn't crossing the 8-lane highway with poorly timed lights (though that's a close second). It's the one block where the bike lane is officially marked as being on the sidewalk.
- whiddershins 9y agoThat's how it is in Berlin. I'm surprised people think it is so weird. Bikes are more like pedestrians than like cars.
- Mediterraneo10 9y agoIt might solve the complaints motorists have, but then you'd have the complaints of pedestrians to deal with. In two major cities in my country, bike lanes have been added to the pavements as a bright red stripe on the side of the pavement closest to the road. Local pedestrians shouldn't walk on that portion of the pavement, but they still do, and if you ring your bell or shout for them to give way, they either ignore you or yell at you. It’s actually much faster to simply cycle on the road with the cars.
- NegativeLatency 9y agoThe legality of riding your bike on the sidewalk varies by state, county and town. In a couple of places in Portland there are signs specifically directing cyclists to use the sidewalk because of streetcar tracks.
- novia 9y agoWhere I am located it is legal, and honestly there is not much alternative. The roads google maps instructs me to take for their bicycle directions are not bicycle friendly. I am directed to take a narrow road with just one lane on each side with motorists going 55 mph, even though there is heavy traffic and no room for motorists to safely pass. It seems like google maps is optimizing for road incline instead of safety. I resorted to using their pedestrian routing to get a route with sidewalks, but of course then it doesn't take road incline into account. No E-bike here. And then oddly enough, the other day their pedestrian routing sent me through A CONSTRUCTION ZONE. That path was definitely not bike friendly or pedestrian friendly. Google maps' bicycle directions never send me down a greenway, it always wants me to be right beside cars. If I have already biked 10 miles, you really don't want me to be right beside cars, as my bicycling becomes more unsteady as I become more tired.