3 ms·
It's interesting to me that you agree with my previous statements about using approximations to be rational, then engage in that exact process to judge these pe
by zzalpha 9y ago
It's interesting to me that you agree with my previous statements about using approximations to be rational, then engage in that exact process to judge these people, and then refuse to offer them the opportunity to do the same.
Uhh, I'm not judging them at all. Where did you get that idea?
As you say, I'm irrational. Everyone is irrational.
Heck, your assumption that I'm somehow judging these people is irrational. :)
All I'm saying is I believe these people are reacting emotionally. That's it. There's no judgement in that. Again, it's simply my view of the facts. And given bikes are being hung in trees, I think not an unreasonable one.
And that fact changes how you solve the problem. Reasoning with someone who isn't thinking in terms of costs and benefits is pointless. You have to engage differently. So acknowledging that this is what is happening is the first step to moving ahead.
- KirinDave 9y ago> Heck, your assumption that I'm somehow judging these people is irrational. :) I'm just taking you at your word: >> Based on how I've seen people behave, I'm assuming it's not. > All I'm saying is I believe these people are reacting emotionally. That's it. This is like, "I'm just saying this water is flowing wetly, that's t it." Why even say it then, if you had no other points to make. I repeat that I think you're confusing rationality with results. Process and outcome are only linked statistically.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]