3 ms·

That sounds reasonable. I'm very surprised. Disabling remote targets, ignoring SELinux, focusing on reliability. DBus is the one part of the modern linux deskt

by onli 9y ago

That sounds reasonable. I'm very surprised. Disabling remote targets, ignoring SELinux, focusing on reliability. DBus is the one part of the modern linux desktop I would like to/have to install to get the applications I want running, even though I dislike it a lot (pulseaudio and systemd one can just not install). One example is the password remember function of steam. Having a more reasonable implementation could help with this a lot.

tomegun 9y ago
For the record: dbus-broker has full SELinux support.
- onli 9y ago
  Well, I don't mind either way. https://github.com/bus1/dbus-broker/wiki#using-dbus-broker https://github.com/bus1/dbus-broker/wiki#using-dbus-broker says it has to be disabled.
  - tomegun 9y ago
    Indeed, thanks for the pointer! Removed that now (it was left-over from before we got SELinux support).
pinpeliponni 9y ago
Hmm. If it doesn't have SELinux policy that actually does something, it probably shouldn't run as a daemon. Let's see how I can remove it... :(
- tomegun 9y ago
  Not sure what you mean here. dbus-broker(1) supports SELinux exactly to the same extent as dbus-daemon(1) does. Also; remove what?