4 ms·

Funny thing that he is using this Socratic method only to religious believes. What about using it on science believes like evolution for instance. The guy in th

• xchip 9y ago
  That is the point, that the same method can be used to question many other topics. For example ideas of a new product/service.
• 0xfeba 9y ago
  A Ray Comfort movie, seriously? He is king of editing footage to make people look the way he wants. Watch around 6:15 as PZ Myers is abruptly cut off before he can explain why we don't see fish change into bears, or whatever impossible goal post Comfort has setup. Comforts insistence on "kinds" is not based on any science. He just claims that because we only see a bunch of small steps, A->B, B-C, E-F, etc. changes in genetics, we will never see A-Z changes. That is, we can only witness incremental changes in DNA, therefore large changes cannot happen because reasons. He's given and shown multiple examples of the process of natural genetic drift, change, etc. and then proclaims that it can only go so far, up to "kinds" without providing any evidence for this limit. Also without defining what a "kind" is. Sorry but this man irks me. He is not honest. He also is known as "banana man" for this pretty weak argument from design: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KqJuITAVWc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KqJuITAVWc