3 ms·
If it's through "secure" code, you can't always guarantee it in the future nor what Mozilla does with this data in the future. Also it doesn't set a good preced
by 0134340 9y ago
If it's through "secure" code, you can't always guarantee it in the future nor what Mozilla does with this data in the future. Also it doesn't set a good precedent to proceed in this direction of opt-out behavior in Firefox.
- Ajedi32 9y agoIn this case, it's not through secure code though, it's through the nature of the data being sent itself. Differential privacy is meant to ensure you _can't_ use the data to make any sort of inferences about individual users; only about users as a whole. That's kinda beside the point here though, as the GP seemed to be against collecting this data _regardless_ of whether or not it's anonymized or not. I'm interested in hearing why.