So letting people who were legitimately wronged receive justice and fair compensation in court for that wrong is "litigiousness" and therefore bad? First, I th

So letting people who were legitimately wronged receive justice and fair compensation in court for that wrong is "litigiousness" and therefore bad? First, I think you misunderstood what litigiousness means. Second, merely labeling something as litigious doesn't make it a bad thing. Litigiousness refers to frivolous lawsuits not legitimate ones. However large corporations have done a campaign of trying to label everything litigious to try and save money. Personally, I like the fact that courts exist to let people redress wrongs. If regulation was so effective at stopping bad behavior, how did banks, one of the most regulated industries in the world, manage to open up phony bank accounts for customers with no regulatory involvement? In fact how did they cause the financial crash with no regulatory intervention? Regulation is a bad joke and I'm convinced it's just a PR stunt by the government to make it look like it's doing something.