3 ms·
Why is this man now being classified as ”alt-right”? It seems to me he's 'just' sexist, I haven't really seen any indication regarding his political beliefs in
by qubex 9y ago
Why is this man now being classified as ”alt-right”? It seems to me he's 'just' sexist, I haven't really seen any indication regarding his political beliefs in general, certainly nothing along the lines of the unthinking intolerance towards minorities, anti-immigration stance, subscription to weird conspiracy theories, and white supremacy that need to be broadly satisfied in order to reliably define somebody as being alt-right. (Yes, it will be argued that sexism correlates with other forms of discrimination, but what is roughly true on average is not necessarily true in every particular case.) Just tarring him with the label of being "alt-right" as a manner of shouting him down seems very lax, particularly when he can be countered with far more compelling arguments.
- virtuabhi 9y ago> Why is this man now being classified as ”alt-right”? (1) Sexism is an integral part of alt-right movement. Most alt-right communities are anti-women as well. (e.g. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/dissecting-trumps-most-rabid-online-following/ https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/dissecting-trumps-most-...) (2) This man has identified himself as an "alt-right" icon by continuously featuring on shows of every despicable alt-right outlet (refer to his twitter account, multiple interviews, etc.). "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck."
- qubex 9y agoI refuse to indulge the fallacy by which an element that exhibits one necessary but insufficient characteristic for membership in a set is nonetheless classified as being definitely a member of that set. He has posited views that certainly reek of sexism. He has appeared on the outlets that are also faux-sensitive to these issues. He is not, however, by virtue of these aspects necessarily an alt-right fanatic.
- rpiguy 9y agoBut he is not sexist. It is not sexist to believe biology could influence interests or to cite peer reviewed research on the topic.
- virtuabhi 9y agoAny real scientist knows that all "peer reviewed research" are not equal, there can be very low quality research. Almost in all "citations", he made a jump from a small experimental study to women in STEM field (or, maybe he simply copied the points of prominent alt-right figures). See this https://www.wired.com/story/the-pernicious-science-of-james-damores-google-memo/ https://www.wired.com/story/the-pernicious-science-of-james-... And there are many "debunkings" like this.