You are spreading misinformation with technically correct statements. Allow me to correct them: > It's worth noting that there is no consensus on the validity

You are spreading misinformation with technically correct statements. Allow me to correct them: > It's worth noting that there is no consensus on the validity or meaning of triple talaq within Sunni Islam. True (as I pointed out. The biggest divide is the Sunni-Shi'a divide). Now why don't you answer: what does 85%+ of muslims think/follow (with the large majority of the remainder being the Shi'a) ? > This is not true, I guess you are confusing it with a khula divorce We are not talking about khula divorce. Obviously, we are talking about a talaq divorce, which has exactly the properties I said: 1) initiated by the man, no defense possible on the woman's part. Anytime, anywhere, mostly immediate or VERY short term, women just gets thrown into the street 2) there are NO financial obligations per se (it is ADVISED to provide money if the man forces the woman to take care of the children, but this cannot be enforced) 3) oh and feel free to point out that islam "advises against" divorcing this way. That's like islam's advice about slaves. > In Islam kids stay with the woman if they are below a certain age, and men take kids above a certain age. True. At that age they are taken away and delivered to the man if he wants that to happen. > I'm not sure what you mean, a woman does not need to seek permission to remarry from her ex-husband. Obviously she does. She needs the divorce to happen. The man does not. Given the punishments I cited that was obvious.