Had to stop at point three. There are just too many assumptions in there that are already shown as incorrect by the world in general. For instance, it's not tr

Had to stop at point three. There are just too many assumptions in there that are already shown as incorrect by the world in general. For instance, it's not true that with losing the personality of horses all cars behaved the same. Why should that change when the driving part is automated? There are so many different needs people try to fulfill with cars. One might want to arrive quickly and electricity efficient. He may prefer something like these lay-back bycicles. Another person wants some recreational time with his family and he will prefer the RV version. Another person simply doesn't have the funds to choose anything but still needs to get from A to B. He may add a request to his Uber app, then a grey little box comes, and on the way to B will put him as much as possible into lines with other box to decrease air resistance, even though that will take more time in the end for the customer. In my experience more automation will end up providing more options not fewer.