> You say biological reasons, I say social programming. The science says biological reasons: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Simon_Baron-Cohen/publicatio

> You say biological reasons, I say social programming. The science says biological reasons: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Simon_Baron-Cohen/publication/232430614_The_Essential_Difference_The_Truth_About_The_Male_And_Female_Brain/links/547cdb7a0cf2cfe203c1fde2/The-Essential-Difference-The-Truth-About-The-Male-And-Female-Brain.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Simon_Baron-Cohen/publi... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/belinda-parmar/sugar-and-spice-unearthin_b_941426.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/belinda-parmar/sugar-and-spice... Among others... > Basically, we have no way of knowing what portion of women's tendencies to gravitate towards certain jobs and careers can be attributed to biological factors vs. to the way they were raised by their parents and conditioned by society. That isn't true, either. Let's look at Sweden, which is a modern egalitarian society. If society is largely gender-blind, then people should overwhelmingly make "free" choices. i.e. choices which are strongly influenced by biology. And we see that. Jobs in Sweden are still overwhelmingly split by gender. Engineers are overwhelmingly male, and people-oriented jobs (nurse, etc.) are overwhelmingly female. Here's another discussion of gender differences: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/games-primates-play/201201/gender-differences-in-personality-are-larger-previously-thought https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/games-primates-play/201... To deny that men and women are psychologically different is to claim that evolution / biology works on the physical attributes, but does not work on the corresponding mental attributes. That claim just cannot possibly be true.