3 ms·
Personal favorite snippet from the article: > With this pedigree, PullRequest has managed to draw interest from 450 teams. Though only a portion of these are a
by kornish 9y ago
Personal favorite snippet from the article:
> With this pedigree, PullRequest has managed to draw interest from 450 teams. Though only a portion of these are actually using the service, PullRequest touts a $136 million annualized revenue run rate.
From Crunchbase: founded May, 2017.
As a disclaimer, I'm no accountant, but that just seems downright deliberately misleading. Their standard plan is $49/mo.
- sethbannon 9y agoProbably a typo or mistake by the reporters.
- rpedela 9y agoMaybe all of their current customers are on the enterprise plan?
- brandonb 9y agoI'd guess it's a 136 thousand run rate, and there's just a typo in the article. $136 million would really be something.
- jimminy 9y agoFrom their standard billing option section. > * Billing is dependent on amount of meaningful change per month. $9 per user per month for static analysis. I agree it still sounds far fetched that their at the $136 million ARR, but it's not infeasible they're somewhere near the the low-to-mid 8-figures, with their enterprise solutions as well. If it was $9/user, for all those companies that figure would require the average team size to be 2,800 people. Which is extremely unlikely.
- coolswan 9y agoThat's a pretty bad typo. $136K.
- lyal 9y agoFounder of PullRequest here: To be clear: $136,000, not $136mm. Typo on article.
- kornish 9y agoGotcha! Thanks for clarifying; that makes a lot more sense. Congrats on the revenue and best of luck growing the company.
- Judgmentality 9y agoI bet that typo gets them a lot of extra attention from investors. Even if they immediately correct them, at the very least they've got their attention to start a conversation.
- nodesocket 9y agolol. I was going to say, PullRequest preparing to IPO soon...